In the incident of Alwar in Rajasthan, there are many such questions that will be searched for answers.
An incident in Rajasthan where Akbar, who was accompanying the cow, went to the crowd and finally he was killed. This incident has once again started attacking and shouting all over India. After Rajnath Singh’s statement in Parliament yesterday, the way the opposition attacked him, he has got sanjivani from this incident and he has started speaking indiscriminately on this issue.
Once again, the guards of the guards have been targeted and this excuse is being targeted on the government .. But if it is seen deeply, then on the last target, it is Hindutva which has been taken to the target … once again. It is known that in the Akhilak case of Parbhum Khan and Dadari, the lie spread over the truth was later revealed, but by then till then religion had been disturbed by unrighteousness and truth has been disturbed by the untrue
It was the same mentality that Sadhvi Pragya Thakur used to say saffron terrorists for 7 years and when she was acquitted by the court, the line was opened for her first interview. But even in that interview, there was no apology for the propaganda done against him by himself, nor any hesitation to feel the pain suffered by him for 7 years .. Once again, Alwar in the discussion is in the discussion.
It is being told that in the Ramgarh village of Alwar district of Rajasthan, once again a case of mobs lining has surfaced. The villagers here beat up a man and killed him on the suspicion of smuggling. The eyewitness to this case is a person named Aslam who is telling Akbar to be himself with him at that time. According to him, it happened when Akbar and he were walking along the pedestrian cows, suddenly some people surrounded them and started banging them. According to Aslam, he ran away from the crowd in some way but Akbar was killed by the crowd.
Some questions arise in this case, which will have to find answers. Aslam has not yet told that for what purpose he and his companion were taking Akbar cows, and if any object was told, then what was proved on the basis of the facts? The biggest question being raised is that in both domestic and domestic jobs of Aslam and Akbar, there was no business of milk in any way.
So the question arises that both the cow was being taken for the purpose of milk or for any other purpose? Although it is not right to support any kind of violence, it is not appropriate to break the law by any of the two parties. It is to be known that the killing of cow slaughter in Rajasthan is legally prohibited.
If there was a parent, then no evidence of these two schools of cow’s milk milk had come to the media so far. With this, if they were taking the Gau Dynasty for their personal care, then why did they need to take it in the darkness of the night, they could take it even in the day .. Apart from this, the place where this incident happened From that place, the personal house of these two are being told far enough, even after this, the meaning of taking the Gau Dynasty on foot is that it is possible that these Gauhs were taking away somewhere other than the house.
Surely the killing of a person can not be justified in any form, but the attack on faith is also not appropriate. Kiss does not remember that event in Denmark where a cartoon was killed in a country and then ambassador to America, and there were violent demonstrations in many places in India, which had a heavy loss. There was a matter of faith in them that no one has ever raised in the court till date. The so-called intellectuals and self-proclaimed secular society have not said these things till now.
It is important for a section to know that the cow places a mother’s place for the Hindu society and not the animal or the food item. In the case of faith, there is no one more tolerant than the Hindu society, who is looking forward to the court’s order even after seeing his admiration in front of his eyes in a tent which has been torn for more than 30 years. In this case, it is necessary to know that why Aslam and Akbar were carrying the cow and with what purpose it is necessary to deal with the culprits. *
* The above thoughts are the author’s independent views ….