Once the High Court had given the decision to remove the mosque, then it was said that the Supreme Court which gave tough decisions on the temple of Shriram today .

The Honorable Supreme Court gave the date on the Ayodhya Shriram Temple case. After the High Court’s verdict in 2010, the case of the Ayodhya Shriram temple was moved to the Supreme Court and from 8 years till today, Ramlalla has been sitting in the tent till date and date only. There have been many such occasions when the Honorable Court has readily appeared on many occasions, but the Ayodhya Shriram Temple case has received date and date only.

It was being said that when the hearing began from October 29 then there will be a hearing every day after that but it did not happen and even this time, only date. Although the date has not been received at this time, the Supreme Court has said that the next hearing will be held in January and the date will be told only in January. We are going to tell you a case in which the Supreme Court had said that people’s beliefs should be respected .

That matter was linked to a mosque, but when it comes to Hindu beliefs, there is a change in the honorable court of justice. We are not questioning the Supreme Court here but are comparing two cases and the comparison comes only in the context. Explain that there was a mosque in the Allahabad High Court (Prayagraj) campus. While hearing a PIL, in November 2017, the High Court had ordered the removal of the mosque within three months.

The court said that this land belongs to the High Court. The construction of the mosque is illegal encroachment, so the mosque should be removed from there within three months. After the High Court this case went to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court banned the action of the removal of the mosque with immediate effect. It was argued that the emigration of the mosque would hurt the feelings of Muslim society. The Supreme Court told the High Court that the two parties should resolve the matter with the interaction between each other.

Apart from this, the Supreme Court had told the Yogi Government that he should tell about giving alternative land to build a mosque. The illegal mosque remains in the Allahabad High Court complex till today, because of its removal, the feelings of Muslims will be hurt but the feelings of Hindus on the Ayodhya issue are irrelevant, whether it is crushed or crooked, it seems that the Honorable Supreme Court does not make any difference does matter.


Ramlalah to remain in tents … Trial on Ayodhya Shriram temple till January 2019. Will the Modi government bring Ordinance?

The hearing in the Supreme Court on Ayurveda has been postponed till January 2019. Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K.M. Joseph’s Bench have already stayed the trial of this case for January next year. It was expected that from Oct 29, the Supreme Court Ayodhya Shriram Temple can hear the case every day, but it has not happened. The Supreme Court has said that the next date of the matter will be decided only in January.

Since now the hearing of the Shriram temple case will be held in January, Ramlalla will remain in the tent for the time being and the hopes of building the temple are going to be demolished soon. Now the eyes of the entire saint and not Hindustan, but the Hindus living around the world, have stuck on the attitude of the central government. In January, the Hindu society has been demanding to set up the temple for the purpose of construction of Shriram Temple by law.

There is only one voice from across the country that the way the ordinance was brought on the SCST Act, the ordinance on three divorces was brought, in the same way, the ordinance should be brought for the construction of the shriram temple and the Shriram temple should be constructed in Ayodhya. . Please tell that before this, a bench headed by former Chief Justice Deepak Mishra was hearing the case. Let us know, this matter is pending in the Supreme Court since 2010, but the hearing has not started yet. The last hearing in this case took place on September 27.

Meanwhile, the lead headed by the then Chief Justice Deepak Mishra had ordered a two-by-one majority that the hearing of the civil rights of the disputed land will be decided on the new bench of three judges on October 29. And today when the case was heard on October 29, the case was postponed till January.